Some of you may remember the bad old days of using 419 welfare benefit
plans to help business owners (and doctors specifically) take massive deductions where the money ultimately went into cash value life insurance. These
plans were sold as a benefit plans, but they were really discriminatory deferred
compensation plans in sheep’s clothing. For a while, there was a legitimate use
of 419 plans with life insurance, but it didn’t take long for the industry to
come crashing down due to the abuses that took place.
Unfortunately, for many, the fallout from those who used 419 plans is still happening today. In the Jerald W. White v. Commissioner (April 2012) case, a doctor who took large deductions for 419 plan contributions lost his audit and ended up not only paying back taxes but also interest and penalties.
What’s interesting about this case besides the reminder that bad tax structures can be financially devastating for clients is the discussion about back taxes and penalties. The defendant tried to get out of back taxes and penalties by stating that the deduction was based on reasonable cause and reliance on substantial authority for such deductions. The court pointed out that at no time did the doctor seek out independent counsel on the authority, and that the doctor relied on the promises of interested parties even though it was clear that the promises seemed too good to be true.
Unfortunately, for many, the fallout from those who used 419 plans is still happening today. In the Jerald W. White v. Commissioner (April 2012) case, a doctor who took large deductions for 419 plan contributions lost his audit and ended up not only paying back taxes but also interest and penalties.
What’s interesting about this case besides the reminder that bad tax structures can be financially devastating for clients is the discussion about back taxes and penalties. The defendant tried to get out of back taxes and penalties by stating that the deduction was based on reasonable cause and reliance on substantial authority for such deductions. The court pointed out that at no time did the doctor seek out independent counsel on the authority, and that the doctor relied on the promises of interested parties even though it was clear that the promises seemed too good to be true.
As an expert witness Lance Wallachs side has never lost a case. He has won
for both plaintiffs and defendants, but not on the same case, that is a joke.
That is not a joke to most people that went into the bad 419 or 412i plans. They
were audited, and then many tried to sue. When they used a lawyer who was
learning on the job they would lose the lawsuit.